Twelve-month research agenda
This page describes our research agenda. Status labels show what is planned, in progress or complete.
Roadmap timeline
Horizontal bars across 0-3, 3-6 and 6-12 months, grouped by program status.
AI-Pass submission
In progressQuality orchestration charter and shared invoice benchmark
PlannedSimulation baseline with fault injection (ROS 2, Gazebo)
PlannedGraph-pruning study
PlannedFirst quality-routing results
PlannedSovra raw data and scoping
In progressDegradation curves and verification methodology note
PlannedIntegrated pipeline paper
PlannedOpen benchmark for extraction or orchestration under constraint
Planned
The diagram is also listed as a table below.
View as table
| Item | Program | Months | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Pass submission | route | 0-2 | In progress |
| Quality orchestration charter and shared invoice benchmark | assure | 0-3 | Planned |
| Simulation baseline with fault injection (ROS 2, Gazebo) | physical | 0-3 | Planned |
| Graph-pruning study | ground | 3-6 | Planned |
| First quality-routing results | assure | 3-6 | Planned |
| Sovra raw data and scoping | foundation | 0-3 | In progress |
| Degradation curves and verification methodology note | physical | 3-6 | Planned |
| Integrated pipeline paper | route | 6-12 | Planned |
| Open benchmark for extraction or orchestration under constraint | foundation | 6-12 | Planned |
Publication stage gates
Venue names are not listed. The funnel shows process stage only.
Publication stage-gate funnel
Scoping through submission. Counts come from the data file.
No items are in the publication pipeline yet. Counts stay at zero until a draft exists.
- 1. Scoping0
- 2. Data and logs reviewed0
- 3. Draft0
- 4. Internal referee-style review0
- 5. Submission0
The diagram is also listed as a table below.
View as table
| Stage | Count |
|---|---|
| Scoping | 0 |
| Data and logs reviewed | 0 |
| Draft | 0 |
| Internal referee-style review | 0 |
| Submission | 0 |
Planned artifact releases
- In progress
AI-Pass submission
route · 0-2 months
- Planned
Quality orchestration charter and shared invoice benchmark
assure · 0-3 months
- Planned
Simulation baseline with fault injection (ROS 2, Gazebo)
physical · 0-3 months
- Planned
Graph-pruning study
ground · 3-6 months
- Planned
First quality-routing results
assure · 3-6 months
- In progress
Sovra raw data and scoping
foundation · 0-3 months
- Planned
Degradation curves and verification methodology note
physical · 3-6 months
- Planned
Integrated pipeline paper
route · 6-12 months
- Planned
Open benchmark for extraction or orchestration under constraint
foundation · 6-12 months
Qualitative risk map
Likelihood by impact. Low, Medium, High only.
Rows: likelihood. Columns: impact. Qualitative only.
- Spread across too many tracks
- Dependence on student labor
- Benchmark credibility
- Overclaimed statistical claims
- Safety overclaim
- Dual-use drift
The diagram is also listed as a table below.
View as table
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependence on student labor | Medium | High | Two people per program, documented pipelines |
| Spread across too many tracks | High | Medium | One lead per track, small physical track |
| Benchmark credibility | Medium | High | Independent adjudication, disclosed construction |
| Overclaimed statistical claims | Medium | High | State assumptions explicitly |
| Safety overclaim | Low | High | Name the testbed stage for every claim |
| Dual-use drift | Low | High | Written policy before any public release |
Work with HOPN Lab
Researchers can apply through EHOPn. The lab agenda is public. Results stay Pending until measurements exist.